Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Not Too Late For Two (City-) States

Economically, can you have a sustainable Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza, that is, on just 22% of historic Palestine? If not, isn’t the whole Annapolis process a waste of time?

A couple of weeks ago, on November 25th., a group of writers and critics
met in London to advance what they call the “one-state” solution—decent people, some of whom I have known personally over the years, who in any case need no grades from me regarding their application of democratic standards: Omar Barghouti, Haim Bresheeth, Ilan Pappe, Nadeem Rouhana, Nur Masalha, Joel Kovel, and others. Their ideas have prompted a vexed (if not exactly new) debate on whether it’s too late for two states. The historian and former Jerusalem deputy-mayor Meron Benvenisti has been warning about this since the early 1980s, and he’s been refining his position ever since.

I’ll not join the debate here: I have written often about the need for any two eventual states (three, if you include Jordan) to work out shared sovereignty where jurisdictions cannot be split: water, telecom, a currency, and so forth. None of this mitigates the need to get things started with two states, Israel and Palestine, centers of gravity for two distinct cultures and, for now, very unequal economies. The dean of peace advocates, Uri Avnery, raised common sense objections to a unitary state back in 2004, and his check-list is worth revisiting.

However, one claim of the one-staters particularly rankles with me, and you hear it all the time, even from people who do not share their edgy political goal. It is that, as their declaration states, the two-state solution “entrenches and formalizes a policy of unequal separation on a land that has become ever more integrated territorially and economically.” Leave aside the question of whether economic integration is a bad thing. (It isn’t, not when wealth comes from know-how, but let it go.) Is there really an “unequal separation" of land? This is where you normally hear about the 22%. Presumably, Israel has 78% and the disparity is the difference between viability and non-viability.

PERHAPS THE BEST way to think this through is to recall the 2005 RAND Corporation study on the future of Palestine, which captured the imaginations of most educated Palestinians and Middle East experts around the world. Its policy suggestions (on security, health, water, etc.,) were unexceptional. What catapulted its lead authors, Steven N. Simon and C. Ross Anthony, into a momentary spotlight was their vivid idea of the “arc.”

According to the study, major towns and cities of Palestine—including Nablus, Ramallah, Jerusalem, Hebron, and Gaza City—would be linked by a high speed train—an arc of rails and overpasses, making it possible to travel from southern Gaza to the northern West Bank in less than 90 minutes. “Each rail station, located several miles from existing historic urban cores,” the study said, “would create a focal point for new development and would connect to a historic core via a new boulevard and an advanced form of rapid bus transit.”

Along the path of the train new commercial and residential neighborhoods would be developed, to accommodate population growth—as many 6.6 million Palestinians by 2020, assuming natural population growth and immigration. The transportation arc would “pump economic activity into the historic centers of Palestinian cities” and assure their preservation and revitalization, creating “a ladder of linear cities along the defining mountain ridge of the West Bank, and preserving open land for agriculture, forests, parks and nature reserves.”

THE RAND PLAN was lovely. What almost nobody seemed to notice, however, was that the Palestine envisioned by the plan was actually an almost perfect mirror image of contemporary Israel within the Green Line. Israel, too, is “a ladder” of linear cities and suburbs, wired to the global economy, settled along the coastal plain—a growing megalopolis, from Beer Sheba to Haifa, swinging around to the Valley of Jezreel and the Galilee, and tied together by a bend of rail and roads.

Indeed, if you superimposed the geometry and area of the wretched Gaza Strip on coastal Israel, from the north of Bat Yam to Netanya, you’d pretty much include the entirety of Tel-Aviv, Ramat Gan, Herzliya, etc., where something more than half the Jewish population of the country live—and by far the greatest part of its GDP is produced.

The very word “country” seems something of an exaggeration in this context. Israel’s coastal plain has a small hinterland, some very pretty mountains in the Galilee, where Jews and Arabs are about equal in number, and breathtaking desert ranges in the Negev, inhabited mainly by Bedouins. Israel, it is true, also includes the corridor to Ben-Gurion airport and up to Jerusalem and back, as Palestine has a corridor to Amman. But such East-West movement is more anomalous than natural.

The fact is, Israelis live on not much more of the historic territory than Palestinians do. The Jewish arc faces an Arab one. Both are city-states: they absorb populations with elevators. And if they want to survive as independent states, both Israel and Palestine will have to integrate into something bigger. Israel is already incorporated into global markets and, like Turkey, should aspire to a place in the European Union. In any case, both Israel and Palestine will immediately need incorporation into larger regional markets, from the Gulf to booming Amman. Israeli Arabs, for their part, will shuttle between both arc lengths, creating a cultural and economic bridge.

A border will of course be necessary, to establish residency for taxes and voting. In the early years, perhaps even a wall will be necessary. But with peace, and in time, how many will care where the border is? I hasten to add that Hebrew culture will not be endangered by the prospect of mingling populations. Like Singapore Chinese, the Hebrew entrepreneurs, technologists, scholars, artists, designers, etc., will establish the region’s liveliest political economy. They will create cultural forces to be reckoned with. Who cares how many square miles Singapore is?

Utopian? Hardly. But even if it were, one thing is clear. It is possible to hold one-big conference where peace advocates gather, enjoy hotel rooms of equal comfort, and speak a nicely accented English to one another. One big state is another matter.

4 comments:

bar_kochba132 said...

How do you feel about leaving both Jewish and Arab communities where they are (including existing Jewish settlements in Judea/Samaria), but with two separate governing bodies and citizenship (one for Jews, one for Arabs) with a joint economic zone and planning? Jews would vote for the Jewish governing body, and Arabs, including those in both Judea/Samaria/Gaza AND the Israeli Arabs voting for the Arab governing body (Israeli Arabs could be guaranteed to continue to receive benefits they have been receiving as Israeli citizens). Security could be under a joint command structure, with Israel being predominate (as it is today) pending Palestinian success at rooting out the terrorist infrastucture-clearly not an overnight task.

bar_kochba132 said...

"Hardly Utopian", you say? You do draw an attractive picture. The only problem is that it can never be implemented. I presume you come from a Labor Zionist background. Labor Zionism started as a rather odd attempt to combine Jewish nationalism with Marxism/Socialism. This meant that it was assumed that the economic progress the Jews would bring to Eretz Israel and the benefits it would inevitably bring the Arab residents of Israel, in addition to the neighboring Arab countries, would, would, in the end, dampen the hostility of the Arabs to the idea of Jewish self-determination in their historic homeland. Thus, it was assumed, the ultimately, the Arabs, like everyone else, according to the Marxist theoreticians, would be motivated primarily by economic considerations. Unfortunately, it didn't work out that way. Regarding the Israeli Arabs, as they became more and more prosperous, the more anti-Israel and Arab nationalist they became (Avirama Golan wrote yesterday in Ha'aretz how even the HADASH/Commmunist Party is now considering adopting the platform that the Jews have no right to a state and that Jewish immigration must be halted, and this from a party that was proud at one time to be mixed Jewish/Arab, and the first to come out for the "2-state solution".)
The Palestinians have shown great willingness to make sacrifices in order to keep their war with Israel going. They voted in the HAMAS government, knowing it would bring international sanctions.
Already during the heyday of Oslo in the 1990's, Arab commentators were openly saying that Peres' "New Middle East" was a major threat to the Arab world being a cover for Jewish attemtps to economically dominate them. The fact that books like "The Protocols of the Elder's of Zion" and "Mein Kampf" are popular among the Arab intelligentsia, shows that ideas like this are not merely on the Arab nationalist fringe. Don't forget that Egyptian State Television produced a couple of years ago a 40+ part series supposedly proving that the "Protocols" are true and it was shown throughout the Arab world. Thus, what chance do you think that the Arabs would agree to the ambitious economic integration program you propose? As long as the US and EU keep pouring money into the Palestinian Authority simply for day-to-day expenses and a minimal standard of living can be maintained for the Palestinian population, their leaders are happy, and they have no reason to accept your proposals, which would simply open them up to attacks that they are traitors and sell-outs to the Zionists.

ibrahim said...

Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat

ekle paylas said...

nice blog Thanks for sharing. voicesohbet was really very nice.
sesli chat siteleri sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslichat seslisohbet
sesli siteleri chat siteleri
sohbet siteleri sesli siteler
voice sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli sohbet seslisohbet
sohbet siteleri sesli chat siteleri
seslichat sesli chat
herkesburda herkes burda
sohbetmerkezi sohbetmerkezi