Monday, August 11, 2008

Do They Think We're Children? Aren't We?

It is hard to think of two more different elections than the Kadima Party primary and the American presidential election, which is why the parallels in insurgent rhetoric are so fascinating.

Both Shaul Mofaz, who is running against Kadima favorite Tzipi Livni, and Labor leader Ehud Barak--not actually running against her, but positioning himself to form the next government--are telling voters that they are fit to command because of their military backgrounds. This is, in case you haven't noticed, what John McCain is saying. Polls suggest the rhetoric is working.

Ironically, the Winograd Commission condemned Ehud Olmert's whole "political echelon," with the notable exception of Livni, for not challenging the military's strategic narrow-mindedness in the second Lebanon war. Most Americans agree that McCain's enthusiasm for the Iraq war was hardly to his credit. But irony, too, is for sissies. Mofaz and Barak are saying we need a military leader at the head of the government, presumably to coordinate with military leaders, while McCain's fitness to lead seems a function of his claim to know "how to win" (well, survive) wars started in a reckless unleashing of imperial force.

The problem is that this impulse to trust leaders who seem--how did Michael Corleone put it?--"strong for the family" can be exposed as misguided time after time. And yet it reasserts itself time after time. We say we need to know what leaders stand for, but we secretly look for signs that they stand up. Something in us wants to be tucked in.

THERE IS A lesson here for both Livni and Obama, and it is not to try to compete with their rivals on how to sound like a military commander-in-chief. What both have to prove, actually, is their wrath in the face of militant simplifiers, their brass to fire commanders-in-chief, if necessary, to get to larger peace agreements. We need to feel their indignation, their power to answer the logic of naked power.

"Does he think we're children?" Livni should be angrily denouncing Mofaz's posturing, as Obama should be denouncing McCain's. Their logic will work because we are not children, their anger will (ironically,) because we are.


Y. Ben-David said...

I don't think it is fair to compare Mofaz to McCain. While I agree with you that people that jump from the military to high office are usually incompetant if not outright dangerous (Eisenhower being an exception), McCain has spent many years in Congress learning how the system works. He did not go straight to high office from the military. An article in the New York Times says he is one of the most influential Senators of either party. Thus, we see has has learned how the (civilian) system works. In any event, even when he was in the military, he was not in a policy-making position at the top, he had been a combat officer.
Mofaz, on the other hand, doesn't have an idea in his head, he parachuted into high office only because of his rank, not because of any real ability. He allowed one of his men (Madhat Yusuf in Joseph's Tomb) to bleed to death while business negotiations were being conducted with Jibril Rajoub on how much money Rajoub was demanding to "allow" the IDF to rescue their man. He of course was the Chief of Staff of the destruction of Gush Katif, so even if he doesn't know how to fight a real war, he does know how to fight against other Jews.

I prefer Livni to be Kadima's leader. She also doesn't have an idea in her head, she also has no principles except smelling out where the money and power are which is what led her to turn her back on her "right-wing" roots (i.e. she, like most of the rest of her colleagues has no ideology, she just knows where she can get her bread buttered). The reason I prefer here is because she will be perceived as being weak (unlike these failed Generals) and will not be able to launch "bold initiatives" like starting a war for political reasons in Lebanon, like Olmert/Peretz did, or sending the IDF to break the skulls of Jewish kids like Olmert did at Amona. Thus, I believe she could cause less mischief than Mofaz. In the past, Prime Minister were builders and movers, today they are destroyers, and I think she would not have the ability to destroy as much as her competitors.

ibrahim said...

Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat

ekle paylas said...

nice blog Thanks for sharing. voicesohbet was really very nice.
sesli chat siteleri sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslichat seslisohbet
sesli siteleri chat siteleri
sohbet siteleri sesli siteler
voice sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli sohbet seslisohbet
sohbet siteleri sesli chat siteleri
seslichat sesli chat
herkesburda herkes burda
sohbetmerkezi sohbetmerkezi