Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Once Again...
...if you have a few minutes, you may want to read through the remarkable string of Comments at TPM Cafe in response to my recent post on Olmert's offer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Responses, mainly to rash opinions about Israel and its conflicts
"Inspired and highly informative: a stunningly fresh narrative of a century old conflict."
Amos Elon, Author of The Pity of it All, Herzl, and The Israelis
“Avishai’s book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand not only the genuine complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but also the real prospects for a sane and peaceful outcome."
Dov Frohman, Founding CEO, Intel-Israel
"During the past two decades, Professor Bernard Avishai has emerged as one of the most eloquent and penetrating analysts of the Israeli scene: of its politics, international relations, religious confrontations, and social fabric; of its national triumphs and failures; of its collective hopes and looming perils. This volume can only add to Avishai's reputation. The Hebrew Republic is indispensable reading even for veteran students of the Jewish State."
Prof. Howard M. Sachar, author of A History of Israel
"If justice and reason still count for anything, "The Hebrew Republic" will profoundly change the Middle East conversation, both here and in Israel. If the notions of a Jewish state and a democratic society sit uneasily together -- if they are, in some sense, thesis and antithesis -- then Bernard Avishai has brilliantly deliniated the indispensable synthesis. This is an exciting and supremely important book."
Hendrik Hertzberg, Senior Editor and Staff Writer, The New Yorker
“Anyone who cares about Israel, the Palestinians, or peace should read The Hebrew Republic—a comprehensive analysis, a compelling vision, a wrenching cri de coeur. Of all the brilliant, brave voices heard here—and there are many—none is as indispensable as Avishai’s, with this book, has now become.”
James Carroll, Author of Constantine’s Sword and House of War
“Bernard Avishai offers a fascinating solution to Israel's existential dilemma: the choice between an ethno-national state, which discriminates against its many non-Jewish citizens, or a binational state that loses its Jewish nature. The book scrutinizes the flaws of Israeli democracy, but is written with a deep love, and provides an upbeat and highly original analysis of the potential of Israel’s new economy. It is a must for anybody who wants to understand today's Israel.”
Prof. Yoram Peri, Head of the Rothschild Caesarea School of Communication, Tel Aviv University, Author of Generals in the Cabinet Room
"The central issue in bringing about peace in the Middle East is whether Israel and the Israelis can find their place in the region where they have carved out their homeland in a manner that is acceptable to others in the region, within and beyond their borders. Bernard Avishai confronts Israelis with the fundamental questions, which only they can answer, and which they cannot indefinitely turn their backs on, about who and what they are. It is hard to imagine clever third-party efforts succeeding as long as these questions remain unanswered. He has made a lucid contribution to solving one of the great problems of our time.”
Amb. Alvaro de Soto, Former UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process
10 comments:
Hi Bernard. Personally, I never liked endless comments and debates. It's like a movie that is almost at its end, and there's no more action. I'm glad for you that this post provoked so much thinking.
I just got Benny Morris’ new book “One State, Two States”. MANDATORY READING FOR EVERYONE!
I was flipping through it and I came across his description of the “Clinton Parameters”. The fact is that the Palestinans REJECTED them. There was no agreement on anything. However, so that the Americans would not cut them off, they called the rejection “acceptance with reservations”, but the reservations pretty negated the whole thing. The Palestinians even rejected Jewish sovereignity over the Western Wall.
So the claim that the Palestinians have pretty much accepted "the solution that everyone knows" and all that is needed is pressure and threats on Israel to get them to go along IS A MYTH.
Um. But isn't Morris a post-Zionist who came around to accept ethnic cleansing and the Zionist state ? What are the sources used ? I'd need to read that but I can't afford it.
In any case, what if it was a myth ? What are the consequences for this being a myth ? I thought the rights of Palestinians were grounded in natural justice, not in the way the history of the negociations is portrayed in history books.
Hi Littlehorn,
If I understand your concept of "natural justice" then Jews have a right to all Palestine including Jordan. Benny Morris is miss understood by both sides. He is, like writer of this blog, an academic (living inside school/university walls). He tries to describe historical events with social and political acceptance of the day, not today.
I am, at your prod, in the process of reading the comments at TPM which are indeed of high quality (so far... there is a lot to go through and I don't mind if it is good). First thing it did for me was question the wisdom of each side voting in a referendum post agreement, though I don't see how it can be avoided since it has been promised. But there are clear advantages to leaders imposing a solution.
But I write here to commend you Bernard Avishai for the clear thinking and articulation on that piece which generated such commentary. This is a pleasure especially at this point when it is so easy to tune out with disgust and despondence.
If I understand your concept of "natural justice" then Jews have a right to all Palestine including Jordan.Um. No, that's not what I'm talking about. I don't know how you arrived at that conclusion...?
Natural justice is a concept of justice that transcends time, place, race, religion. Try this text.
I don't consider Palestinians as a nation and therefore as entitled to land, I consider every individual within the Palestinian 'group' as having natural rights to property, liberty and life.
So, if I were to consider the case of Jordan, or indeed any place on the face of the earth, Jews, as one group of human beings amongst many, do not have a right to it, but they certainly have a right to move there, find a house and work, and live their lives as they wish to, so long as this is in accordance with basic principles of justice.
I finished reading the string and it was not a few minutes of my time but very well worth it. There are also links to be pursued.
I asked myself what was different and ( unfortunately) special from the usual butting of heads, colliding of opinions in this conversation. It starts with the initial post which, as I said, was thoughtful and well articulated. The comments followed this template which is not about being even-handed but about being fair and also grown-up ( for want of a better way of putting it). Also consideration of points being made lead to other points and other considerations added. Very productive and it is a conversation. It proves (again) that ending this conflict should not be left only ( or at all- they had and lost their chances) to the main actors, and that the working out/ironing out should not ever have been halted.
There was, a few days ago, an excellent piece in The Guardian- and a link to the fuller pdf version
The Paradox of Israel's Pursuit of Might
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/09/israel-middle-east-max-hastings
fuller version:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2009/05/08/limitsofforce-hastings.pdf
Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat
replica Hermes accoutrements are the a lot of approved afterwards appearance accessories followed by the acclaimed Hermes purse. These are not alone appearance statements but are aswell advised astute investments. A Hermes bag does not appear cheap.
nice blog Thanks for sharing. voicesohbet was really very nice.
sesli chat siteleri sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslichat seslisohbet
sesli siteleri chat siteleri
sohbet siteleri sesli siteler
voice sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli sohbet seslisohbet
sohbet siteleri sesli chat siteleri
seslichat sesli chat
herkesburda herkes burda
sohbetmerkezi sohbetmerkezi
Post a Comment